Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence Of Directed Free-energy Technology On 9/11

• Popularity - 22582 views, 3226.0 views per day, 7 days on eBay. Super high amount of views. 453 sold.
• Price - Avg: $0.00, Low: $0.00, High: $0.00. Best quality when compared to PicClick similar items.
• Seller - + items sold. 0% negative feedback. Great seller with very good positive feedback and over 50 ratings.

Hardcover:<br>544 pages<br>Publisher:<br>The New Investigation (2010)<br>Language:<br>English<br>ISBN-10:<br>0615412564<br>ISBN-13:<br>978-0615412566<br>Product Dimensions:<br>10.1 x 7.3 x 1.4 inches<br>Shipping Weight:<br>3.4 pounds<br>If you are among those who have called for a new, open, and independent investigation, today’s your lucky day! This is not only “The New Investigation,” it is<br>the only<br>comprehensive-forensic investigation to date in the public domain. As of this publication only one person —myself, Dr. Judy Wood— has conducted a comprehensive investigation to determine<br>what<br>happened to the World Trade Center (WTC) complex. This was part of the federal<br>qui tam<br>(whistleblower) case I filed (2007) in which I accused the defendants of science fraud.<br>This book is a summary of the physical evidence submitted in my federal<br>qui tam<br>case accusing the defendants of science fraud. NIST was mandated by congress to “Determine why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed…” yet NIST admitted to me that they did not analyze the “collapse.” The contractors they hired with taxpayer money knowingly allowed the fraudulent report to become final.<br>Sadly, this case had no support from the “Truth movement,” leaving the judges free to ignore the law in order to dismiss the case (which they acknowledged they did) so they could sweep it under the carpet. Had this case been allowed to move forward, the defendants (whose expertise is energy weapons) would have been put under oath (equivalent to subpoena power).<br>This book contains physical evidence, not theories or speculation, but physical evidence that is overwhelming and conclusive as to what happened.  But for the record, I do not believe that our government<br>is<br>responsible for executing the events of 9/11/01; nor do I believe that our government<br>is not<br>responsible for executing the events of 9/11/01.<br>This is not a case of<br>belief<br>. This is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.<br>The order of crime solving is to determine<br>1)<br>WHAT<br>happened, then<br>2)<br>HOW<br>it happened (e.g., what weapon), then<br>3)<br>WHO<br>did it. And only then can we address<br>4)<br>WHY<br>they did it (i.e. motive).<br>Let us remember what is required to<br>(legally)<br>convict someone of a crime. You cannot convict someone of a crime based on<br>belief<br>. You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with. If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told<br>who<br>did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.<br>Many people have speculated as to<br>who<br>committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or<br>how<br>they did so. But without addressing<br>what<br>happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than<br>conspiracy theory<br>, a phrase that also describes the<br>19 bad guys with box cutters story<br>we were given<br>before<br>noon on 9/11/01.<br>My own research is<br>not<br>speculation. It is a forensics investigation of<br>what<br>happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01. I don’t address<br>who<br>did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now. Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine<br>what<br>happened.<br>By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with<br>conspiracy<br>theory of any kind. The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called<br>9/11 truth movement<br>) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to my research. On the other hand, to dete